US Judge Blocks Key Parts of Texas Migrant Arrest Law

May 14 (Reuters) – A federal judge on ⁠Thursday ⁠blocked Texas authorities from enforcing ⁠key parts of a law that would allow state officials to ​arrest and deport people suspected of having illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border.

Austin-based U.S. District Judge David Ezra ‌issued a preliminary injunction at the ‌behest of the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups pursuing a class action ⁠on behalf ⁠of thousands of people who could be subject to the law’s provisions.

Ezra, ​who was appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said the state law was preempted by federal law and improperly challenged the federal government’s long-held power to control immigration, naturalization and deportations.

“At the broadest ​level, SB 4 conflicts with federal immigration law because it provides state officials the power ⁠to ⁠enforce federal law without federal ⁠supervision,” Ezra ​wrote.

Spokespeople for Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office is defending the law, did not ​respond to requests for ⁠comment.

The lawsuit was filed last week to prevent parts of the 2023 law from taking effect, after a federal appeals court in April overturned an earlier injunction issued during Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration that had prevented the Republican-backed measure known as SB 4 from being enforced.

Republican ⁠President Donald Trump’s administration had dropped a case the Biden administration brought challenging the ⁠law. Immigrant-rights groups that had also sued pressed on, but the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded the organizations lacked legal standing to pursue their case.

The new ACLU-backed lawsuit sought to address that issue by instead suing on behalf of noncitizens who could be subject to four key provisions of the law, which is set to take effect on Friday.

Those provisions include ones that make it a state crime for someone to reenter the U.S. after deportation, even if they have ⁠federal permission to do so or have since obtained a green card, and that give magistrate judges in Texas the power to issue deportation orders.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs in a joint statement hailed Ezra’s ruling.

“Texas cannot override the U.S. Constitution and ​should stop wasting time attempting to do so,” they said.

(Reporting by Nate ​Raymond in Boston; Editing by Thomas Derpinghaus)

Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

Leave a Comment